Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | 2013-06-09login
Stories from June 9, 2013
Go back a day, month, or year. Go forward a day, month, or year.
1.Petition to Pardon Edward Snowden (whitehouse.gov)
748 points by _wk3u on June 9, 2013 | 179 comments
2.Why didn't tech company leaders blow the whistle? (stanford.edu)
551 points by ot on June 9, 2013 | 82 comments
3.Tor and HTTPS (eff.org)
430 points by claudius on June 9, 2013 | 127 comments
4.How three pacifists were convicted as terrorists (commondreams.org)
403 points by swombat on June 9, 2013 | 163 comments
5.Iain Banks dies of cancer aged 59 (bbc.co.uk)
350 points by andyjohnson0 on June 9, 2013 | 133 comments
6.People with nothing to hide (twitter.com/_nothingtohide)
322 points by alfo on June 9, 2013 | 253 comments
7.Joseph Nacchio (wikipedia.org)
297 points by teawithcarl on June 9, 2013 | 47 comments
8.How well do you know HTML? (jakearchibald.github.io)
265 points by bolshchikov on June 9, 2013 | 88 comments
9.Room 641A (wikipedia.org)
248 points by llambda on June 9, 2013 | 44 comments
10.Rand Paul wants to lead a Supreme Court challenge to Feds' tracking of Americans (foxnews.com)
246 points by jchavannes on June 9, 2013 | 71 comments

Ray Ozzie here. Regarding "minitruth" - you've got to maintain a bit of a sense of humor when things get stressful.

It was such a long time ago, but one thing that clearly differentiates our efforts in those days vs. what's been reported in the news in the past few days is the issue of transparency.

The day we shipped the "differential workfactor" implementation in Notes, I keynoted the RSA Conference and gave a speech laying out what we did and why. Charlie Kaufman, a great cryptographer who worked for me, also distributed a paper he wrote with the technical details. You can find my speech and his paper buried in here if you're interested. (search for "lotus.notes")

http://web.textfiles.com/ezines/HWA/hwa-hn19.txt

And if you're really motivated to understand what it was like during the Crypto Wars, go read Steven Levy's book "Crypto".

http://www.stevenlevy.com/index.php/books/crypto

Back to the present - it pains me to see such a lack of transparency in how our elected officials are running our government. Of course, the common man knows it's common sense that there's an inherent need for secrecy in conducting small scale covert operations. We do get it.

However, it's also common sense that it's inevitable that any complex large-scale long-term operation will ultimately come to light. And so it's just common sense that any such broad-based operations that might be perceived as impacting our constitutional rights should be the subject of broad public debate. No, not when they're being prototyped or tested or used in small scale settings - but definitely somewhere on the path from "tactical use" to "broad strategic dependence".

These are not small issues, nor need they be at all partisan. Wyden, Paul, and others are trying. Theses issues are fundamental to defining the relationship between us citizens and our government in the decades ahead.

In particular, in this world where "SaaS" and "software eats everything" and "cloud computing" and "big data" are inevitable and already pervasive, it pains me to see how 3rd Party Doctrine may now already be being leveraged to effectively gut the intent of U.S. citizens' Fourth Amendment rights. Don't we need a common-sense refresh to the wording of our laws and potentially our constitution as it pertains to how we now rely upon 3rd parties? It makes zero sense in a "services age" where granting third parties limited rights to our private information is so basic and fundamental to how we think, work, conduct and enjoy life.

For example, did you really intend to yield your 4th amendment rights when you granted a 3rd party access to your files as a part of Mac Software Update, Windows Update, Virus Scanners, etc., or when you started using a service-tethered smartphone?

Anyway, unlike 'web tracking' issues which seem to be broadly ignored because of our love for ad-supported services, I hope we all (especially the young readers of reddit, hackernews, etc) wake up to the fact that these privacy and transparency issues are REAL, and that they truly will impact you and the country you live in, and that even if you don't consider yourself an activist you really should get informed and form an opinion. Again, this is a non-partisan issue, and let's all work to ensure that it stays this way.

Two great organizations where you can learn are EPIC and EFF. (Disclosure: I am on the board of EPIC.) Take it in, and think. Your contributions are needed and would of course be quite welcome.

http://epic.org

http://eff.org

12.Assange: US rule of law suffering 'calamitous collapse' (france24.com)
179 points by stfu on June 9, 2013 | 61 comments
13.Vagrant: Create and configure portable development environments (vagrantup.com)
178 points by neurostimulant on June 9, 2013 | 79 comments
14.Microsoft admits Patriot Act can access EU-based cloud data (2011) (zdnet.com)
177 points by laumars on June 9, 2013 | 25 comments
15.Don’t Take Your Vitamins (nytimes.com)
175 points by ColinWright on June 9, 2013 | 172 comments
16.Hundreds march in Singapore against website licensing regime (rt.com)
160 points by liotier on June 9, 2013 | 82 comments
17.What are the implications of NSA surveillance on the average Internet user? (security.stackexchange.com)
157 points by Otiel on June 9, 2013 | 28 comments
18.ECHELON was used for industrial espionage (European Commission report) (cryptome.org)
151 points by _ntka on June 9, 2013 | 66 comments
19.United States incarceration rate (wikipedia.org)
150 points by ap22213 on June 9, 2013 | 95 comments

"Once he reached the conclusion that the NSA's surveillance net would soon be irrevocable, he said it was just a matter of time before he chose to act. "What they're doing" poses "an existential threat to democracy", he said."

Thoughtful people brave enough to blow whistles seem to be the greatest check on what looks like a secret, unaccountable, illegal centralization of power based on lies from the top of the government on down.

Many powerful people will see him otherwise. I shudder to think of what will become of him, though I'm sure we'll see it played out in headlines.

Whistle-blowers are not our only defense, however, as we all have power too, for example contributing to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF):

"His allegiance to internet freedom is reflected in the stickers on his laptop: "I support Online Rights: Electronic Frontier Foundation," reads one. Another hails the online organisation offering anonymity, the Tor Project."

My personal favorite is the Freedombox project: https://www.freedomboxfoundation.org/learn

EFF: https://www.eff.org

(By the way, I don't know about anybody else, but for the first time I can think of, I'm seriously concerned about the consequences of posting support for somebody like this online. I don't know how things will play out years down the road and who will do what with this information.)

EDIT: Followed up by posting the above on my blog -- http://joshuaspodek.com -- based on comments below.

21.What If China Hacks the NSA's Massive Data Trove? (mashable.com)
135 points by LemonadeBoy on June 9, 2013 | 55 comments
22.Google set to acquire Waze for $1.3B (globes.co.il)
142 points by calanya on June 9, 2013 | 59 comments
23.Linux Performance Analysis and Tools (dtrace.org)
127 points by jswanson on June 9, 2013 | 24 comments
24.Feynman vs. The Abacus (ryerson.ca)
126 points by js2 on June 9, 2013 | 33 comments

By the way, I don't know about anybody else, but for the first time I can think of, I'm seriously concerned about the consequences of posting support for somebody like this online. I don't know how things will play out years down the road and who will do what with this information.

I don't know about you, but that's a chance I'm willing to take. As far as I'm concerned, Edward Snowden is an American hero and deserves a medal and a ticker-tape parade before he deserves to spend the rest of his life on the run, and possibly ultimately in a jail cell, or having his life taken prematurely by US operatives.

I think he did the right thing though, by going public. Presumably he knew the odds that "they" would track him down anyway, and by going public he has a chance to leverage popular public sentiment as a shield of sorts. As he says, it's a tactic to keep them from "going dirty". He might still wind up in jail, but there's a better chance now that they'll have to deal with him through ordinary judicial means, and (hopefully) no torture, or secret imprisonment at Guantanamo or whatever.

Hopefully Iceland (or maybe Ecuador!) will grant him political asylum and give him a shot at a semi-normal life, albeit far from his original home.

Postscript: To any NSA / CIA / FBI / etc. spooks who are reading this - blow me.

26.NSA has massive database of Americans' phone calls (2006) (usatoday.com)
110 points by danial on June 9, 2013 | 14 comments
27.The Spy Factory (pbs.org)
107 points by Geeek on June 9, 2013 | 6 comments
28.Thinking of Doing a PhD? Take this simple test (prof.so)
103 points by tchalla on June 9, 2013 | 44 comments

Questions for people with nothing to hide:

1. Have you ever had an abortion?

2. Have you ever cheated on your husband / wife?

3. Are you currently looking for a new job?

4. Have you ever being diagnosed with a mental illness?

5. Are you currently on anti-depressants?

6. Were you ever sexually abused as a child?

7. Have you ever fancied someone of the same sex?

8. Have you ever had sex with someone of the same sex?

9. Have you ever criticised your current employer or boss to anyone else?

10. Do you love all of your children equally?

11. Have you ever fantasized about...

12. Are you planning to get pregnant in the next two years?

13. Have you ever lied on a cv/resume?

14. Are you mean to your wife / husband on a regular or semi-regular basis?

15. Do you have trouble acquiring or maintaining an erection?

16. Are you one of those women who’ve never had an orgasm?

17. What prescription drugs are you currently taking?

18. Have you ever cut yourself?

19. Have you ever attempted suicide?

20. Have you contemplated suicide in the past 2 weeks?

21. Would you be happy with your answers to these questions being made public? Or being read by your employer, local 23 year old policeman, or nosey neighbour?

I could go on and on. None of the actions mentioned in these questions are illegal, but for many/most people, the answers would be intensely private.

30.U.S., companies: Internet surveillance does not indiscriminately mine data (washingtonpost.com)
85 points by ennuihenry on June 9, 2013 | 62 comments

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: