Actually, it’s a well-founded specific criticism (all of them are; no accidents there) of an underlying problem which contributes to the very concept I’m laboriously explaining. I note you didn’t refute my point at all, choosing instead to somewhat ironically call it unintelligent, and that you’re vaguely upset about it without a clear path to proving me wrong should speak more to what I’m trying to tell you.

I don't really see how most founders being white is a criticism - sure most of them are in a position of privilege, but that's because they're born into the upper classes and went to universities whose degrees cost more than most people's houses. The race factor comes from the fact that the disproportionate majority of wealthy families in the US are white. I mean, you don't see a proportional share of black or hispanic founders in Cali but you also don't see a proportional share of working-class white founders from the heartland either. We have the same thing in the UK.

I agree with most of the other criticisms except the identity stuff, because I'm disappointed by our industry. We were going to open up the world and make it a better place but it seems to have gone off the rails and become much more like the finance industry or other grim husks. The pretense remains but the reality is pretty cancerous. The platforms that are supposed to bring us together gave us depression, massive political division and put us under constant surveillance. The innovative ideas gave way to chasing fads for that sweet vc cash. The decentralised experimental currency is now penny stocks on steroids (although you could argue that was inevitable). I guess you could say the utopian vision died a sad death and not everyone wanted to see it go.

yeah that could well be the case. Either way, the prospect of your industry making a positive impact dying before your eyes is lame, whether it was ever really capable of that change or not.

That is the interpretation I’d expect from someone bought in, to only see people and their perspectives along an axis of wealth generation impetus. I’m sorry to disappoint, but also realize I’m probably incapable of explaining it to you, since my perspective is an imaginary component way off of your real number axis.

I’m boxed in a corner. If I explain it one way, you’ll interpret a Luddite sentiment. If I explain it another, you’ll interpret an affinity toward socialism. Yet another, and you’ll conclude I’m mentally challenged. I’m still working on vocalizing my detest for the valley and this audience in a form which is productive as opposed to punitive, so you’ll have to check back with me when I’ve matured that.