Nit:
"Event A is the first of all events to happen. Event C is in between the other two".
is confusing wording because having just specified event A as being first, one might think the phrase "between the other two" refers to events B and C.
However, "other" in this case is local to the second sentence and refers to A and B. As a human this took me several reads to parse correctly.
That doesn't seem to be the cause for its confusion. I just tried the following, which avoids the use of "other" and any mismatch between letter ordering and event ordering, just to make things as easy as possible. It still fails:
Me: Imagine a set of 3 events (A, B and C) ordered with unique timestamps each. Event A is the first of all events to happen. Event B is in between events A and C. What is a valid bound for Event C's timestamp?
ChatGPT: A valid bound for Event C's timestamp would be a time after the timestamp for Event A, but before the timestamp for Event B. This is because events are typically assumed to happen in chronological order, so an event that comes after Event A but before Event B would be the logical next event in the sequence. Of course, the exact bounds for Event C's timestamp would depend on the specific timestamps for Events A and B. For example, if Event A happened at 1:00 PM and Event B happened at 1:30 PM, then a valid bound for Event C's timestamp would be any time between 1:00 PM and 1:30 PM.
is confusing wording because having just specified event A as being first, one might think the phrase "between the other two" refers to events B and C.
However, "other" in this case is local to the second sentence and refers to A and B. As a human this took me several reads to parse correctly.