Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"Outrageous"? It's two tenths of a cent per minute. How much will it impact you, really, particularly relative to the cost of compute?


It's outrageous because self hosted runners are... self hosted.

And the entire solution just sucks. It's bad, bad software. It barely works a lot of the time.

The only reason they're doing this is because they can. Which is usually a really stupid reason. And here, it is. So, that's outrageous.


> because self hosted runners are... self hosted.

Sure, but there's a separate mechanism that you need to make it all work: the orchestration. Without that, you have only the capacity to run jobs -- it's potential energy, if you will, not doing real work.

That orchestrator thus provides real value. And it's not like it's free for them to build, operate, and maintain.


The CI pipeline using my own runner is absolutely something that I expect to come for free with hosting the repository.


At our company, it's ~35k USD increase annually. This is not negligeable.


That’s 2.5x what my actual runners cost. For every $100 in compute, I will be paying $250 to github. They can fuck right off


I'm curious - where are you finding runners for $0.0008/minute? What are their specs?


Ubicloud. Also faster than the analog runners github provide. Only problem is startup time is slower




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: