Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

[flagged]


>> LLMs are the eternal September for software

>Cliche.

Too early to tell, so let's wait and see before we brush that off.

>> in that the sort of people who couldn’t make it through a bootcamp can now be “programming thought leaders”

>Snobbery.

Reality and actually a selling point of AI tools. I see pretty often ads for making apps without any knowledge of programming

>> the sort of people who breathlessly announce

> Snobbery / Cliche.

Reality

>> There’s no longer a reliable way to filter signal from noise.

> Cliche.

Reality, or do you destinguish a well programmed app from unaudited BS

>> There’s utility in these tools, but 99% of the content creators in AI are one intellectual step above banging rocks together

>Cliche / Snobbery.

99% is to high, maybe 50%

>> their judgement of progress is not to be trusted

> Tell me, timr, how much judgement is there is in snotty gatekeeping and strings of cliches?

We have many security issues in software coded by people who have experience in coding, how much do you trust software ordered by people who can't jusge if the program they get is secure or full of security flaws? Don't forget these LLMs are trained on pre existing faulty code.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: