You have misunderstood me. My point was sexuality is never a choice. Acting on impulse is a choice; suffering from impulse is not.
I suggest you go back and re-read what I have written before you embarrass yourself further.
I never brought race into the equation. In order for suicide to be considered the norm it would have be the de facto standard for living organisms. Roughly, 50.1% of all living creatures. I can cite 7 examples that back up my claim -
Movement Respiration Sensitivity Growth Reproduction Excretion Nutrition
Common sense also tells us that suicide cannot be normal behaviour otherwise all biological organisms would eventually degrade to 0 lifeforms.
If my words are hurtful it is because time and time again we see posters on HN tossing out absolutely junk statements that they think are well-informed. When pressed they resort to an argumentative form of
Present [ALL] evidence [EVER] or I reject reasoned opinions.
Normally the follow us is something along the lines of
*Your [SOURCE/RESEARCH/DATA] is flawed because of [UTTERLY INTANGIBLE REASON].
There comes a time when, as a person and a member of society you have to accept that we are not living in a simulation but that the evidence in front of you is actually satisfactory.
Suicide is not normal. It was ludicrous and silly for you to toss out a random objection to my statement.
I suggest you go back and re-read what I have written before you embarrass yourself further.
I never brought race into the equation. In order for suicide to be considered the norm it would have be the de facto standard for living organisms. Roughly, 50.1% of all living creatures. I can cite 7 examples that back up my claim - Movement Respiration Sensitivity Growth Reproduction Excretion Nutrition
Common sense also tells us that suicide cannot be normal behaviour otherwise all biological organisms would eventually degrade to 0 lifeforms.
If my words are hurtful it is because time and time again we see posters on HN tossing out absolutely junk statements that they think are well-informed. When pressed they resort to an argumentative form of
Present [ALL] evidence [EVER] or I reject reasoned opinions.
Normally the follow us is something along the lines of
*Your [SOURCE/RESEARCH/DATA] is flawed because of [UTTERLY INTANGIBLE REASON].
There comes a time when, as a person and a member of society you have to accept that we are not living in a simulation but that the evidence in front of you is actually satisfactory.
Suicide is not normal. It was ludicrous and silly for you to toss out a random objection to my statement.